In the absence of effective solutions to complex socio-economic challenges, the political left in Slovenia appears to be undergoing significant radicalization. Criticism is no longer reserved for ideological opponents but is increasingly directed at anyone who does not fully align with a narrowly defined set of beliefs.
People with differing opinions are often categorized into various forms of "deniers": climate change deniers, science deniers, genocide deniers, equality deniers. In many cases, however, these individuals are not denying facts but expressing skepticism about whether proposed policies will yield meaningful improvements.
There is a long-standing tradition within leftist movements to justify the restriction of individual freedoms in the name of the common good. This is often coupled with the assumption that policies will always function as intended—an assumption that, in practice, frequently proves false.
Not long ago, those who raised concerns about the technical limitations of the electric grid were labeled climate change deniers. Today, Slovenia is facing high electricity distribution charges, suggesting those concerns were not without merit.
Even center-left figures like Borut Pahor have come under fire—simply for stating that the war in Gaza does not meet the current legal definition of genocide. Ironically, international efforts are now underway to amend that very definition, indicating a recognition of its limitations.
It is perhaps to be expected that, for those accustomed to ideological certainty, any dissent may feel like denial. What is more troubling is how widespread this mindset has become in Slovenia, in contrast to much of the rest of the EU.
This growing radicalism not only damages the quality of public discourse and social cohesion within Slovenia but also undermines the country's credibility and standing on the international stage. A more pluralistic and self-critical approach would serve both Slovenia and its global reputation far better.